Re: Common server activation

From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel gnu org>
To: konold alpha tat physik uni-tuebingen de
CC: kde-devel kde org, ctibirna total net, gnome-kde-list gnome org, sopwith redhat com, matt gnome-support com, nat nat org, kde-devel max tat physik uni-tuebingen de, recipient list notshown: ;
Subject: Re: Common server activation
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 07:26:59 -0500


> Does this implicitly mean that GNOME will use different semantics for
> .desktop files compared to KDE? (I am refering to the stuff Preston put a
> lot of effort in)

I do not think Preston's paper addresses object activation.

And I disagree with having mime-types being defined in .desktop files
as well.  I think they are orthogonal to .desktop files and should be
placed in a different file.

Miguel.

References:
- Re: Common server activation
  - From: Martin Konold

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]