Re: Common server activation
- From: Martin Konold <konold alpha tat physik uni-tuebingen de>
- To: kde-devel kde org
- cc: Cristian Tibirna <ctibirna total net>, gnome-kde-list gnome org, sopwith redhat com, matt gnome-support com, nat nat org, kde-devel max tat physik uni-tuebingen de
- Subject: Re: Common server activation
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:19:34 +0200 (CEST)
On Sun, 27 Jun 1999, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> We considered this at some length for the Gnome solution. IIRC the reason
> is simply that .desktop files are for menu entries and icons; this goal
> does not correspond one-to-one with what you want for activation. That is,
> there are servers that certainly don't need an icon, and executables that
> implement lots of different servers, etc.
Does this implicitly mean that GNOME will use different semantics for
.desktop files compared to KDE? (I am refering to the stuff Preston put a
lot of effort in)
Regards,
-- martin
// Martin Konold, Herrenbergerstr. 14, 72070 Tuebingen, Germany //
KDE: A stable GUI for a reliable OS.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
