Re: Transifex instance for GNOME
- From: Jeff Schroeder <jeffschroeder computer org>
- To: Gil Forcada <gforcada gnome org>
- Cc: gnome-i18n <gnome-i18n gnome org>, gnome-infrastructure <gnome-infrastructure gnome org>, Alexandro Silva <penguim ubuntu com>, Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>
- Subject: Re: Transifex instance for GNOME
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:44:35 -0700
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Gil Forcada <gforcada gnome org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> André's ping was about bug:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599066
>
> Which Paul Cutler said you were working on.
>
> Could you give us a status update on it?
Hi Gil,
I've not worked on this bug at all yet but am going to work on it
tomorrow evening and hope to have something by the end of this week.
Alexandro is going to install a transifex instance for you.
> El dc 27 de 10 de 2010 a les 11:34 -0300, en/na Alexandro Silva va
> escriure:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Sorry my big delay. I don't use this mail ( penguim gmail com )
>> anymore.
>> So I can help in the Transifex instance install, do you have any
>> information about that? How install for example?
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>> Alexandro Silva
>> alexoslabs gmail com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > * Find a team of people to take the job
>> > > * Install a Transifex instance on GNOME infrastructure
>> > > * Configure Transifex for GNOME needs
>> > > * Test Transifex global functionality (pilot languages?)
>> > > * Decide to switch (or not to switch)
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net> wrote:
>> Alexandro: ping?
>>
>> Am Samstag, den 16.10.2010, 07:44 -0500 schrieb Paul Cutler:
>>
>> > Alexandro Silva had been working on this. Alexandro, do
>> you have any
>> > updates? The original bug
>> > was https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599066
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> >
>> > Paul
>> >
>> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Gil Forcada
>> <gforcada gnome org>
>> > wrote:
>> > Hi sysadmins.
>> >
>> > I'm quite sure you are aware of the new moduleset
>> proposal
>> > made by the
>> > release team and the discussion that started at the
>> gnome-i18n
>> > mailing
>> > list about how to support external modules not
>> hosted on GNOME
>> > infrastructure.
>> >
>> > In the following mail Claude says that Damned-Lies
>> the program
>> > that runs
>> > on l10n.gnome.org could support auto-commit from the
>> web
>> > interface but
>> > is blocker is on your side.
>> >
>> > Please, could you elaborate the stat of the affairs
>> regarding
>> > this
>> > topic?
>> >
>> > Could we try to get the details of why it isn't done
>> yet? Not
>> > to blame!
>> > just to elaborate a plan or try to figure out how to
>> fix the
>> > spots.
>> >
>> > In a not so recent survey we made on GNOME language
>> teams
>> > coordinators
>> > one of the more requested features for improving
>> Damned-Lies
>> > was to get
>> > auto-commit from within Damned-Lies itself, so if
>> anyone can
>> > fix that
>> > blocker be sure that your work will be hugely
>> appreciated!
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> >
>> > El dv 15 de 10 de 2010 a les 09:41 +0200, en/na
>> Claude Paroz
>> > va
>> > escriure:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > In recent discussions about new GNOME modulesets
>> > reorganizations,
>> > > several people have expressed the proposal to
>> install a
>> > Transifex
>> > > instance to replace Damned Lies.
>> > >
>> > > I'm absolutely not opposed to such an idea. But
>> I'm also not
>> > convinced
>> > > that we will be able to keep current D-L
>> functionalities.
>> > However if we
>> > > get some new ones, maybe the global balance might
>> still be
>> > positive.
>> > > I think the main objective would be to support (a)
>> > auto-commit in GNOME
>> > > git infrastructure (the blocker is currently on
>> sysadmin
>> > side) and (b)
>> > > auto-commit in an i18n branch of each tracked
>> branch for
>> > modules not
>> > > hosted in GNOME infrastructure.
>> > >
>> > > We need now some people to take care of this.
>> Personally I
>> > currently
>> > > don't have the required time to dive into this
>> issue.
>> > >
>> > > Here are some steps we could follow to go further:
>> > > * Find a team of people to take the job
>> > > * Install a Transifex instance on GNOME
>> infrastructure
>> > > * Configure Transifex for GNOME needs
>> > > * Test Transifex global functionality (pilot
>> languages?)
>> > > * Decide to switch (or not to switch)
>> > >
>> > > Thoughts?
>> > >
>> > > Claude
>> >
>> > --
>> > gil forcada
>> >
>> > [ca] guifi.net - una xarxa lliure que no para de
>> créixer
>> > [en] guifi.net - a non-stopping free network
>> > bloc: http://gil.badall.net
>> > planet: http://planet.guifi.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > gnome-infrastructure mailing list
>> > gnome-infrastructure gnome org
>> >
>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
>> >
>> >
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > gnome-i18n mailing list
>> > gnome-i18n gnome org
>> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
>>
>> --
>> mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
>> http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alexandro Silva
>> http://blog.alexos.com.br
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnome-i18n mailing list
>> gnome-i18n gnome org
>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
>
> --
> gil forcada
>
> [ca] guifi.net - una xarxa lliure que no para de créixer
> [en] guifi.net - a non-stopping free network
> bloc: http://gil.badall.net
> planet: http://planet.guifi.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-infrastructure mailing list
> gnome-infrastructure gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
--
Jeff Schroeder
Don't drink and derive, alcohol and analysis don't mix.
http://www.digitalprognosis.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
