Re: UNCONFIRMED state in Bugzilla (was Fwd: [Bug 542087] Graphical glitches after "change scroll region"

[Sandy Armstrong <sanfordarmstrong gmail com>]

That being said, I'm sure I could adapt if UNCONFIRMED went away.  :-)

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Sandy Armstrong
<sanfordarmstrong gmail com> wrote:
> Who's "we"?  I use UNCONFIRMED vs NEW all the time in my modules.
>
> I know the gtk+ team doesn't make a distinction between the two, but I
> wasn't aware of any GNOME-wide policy.
>
> Thanks,
> Sandy
>
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad behdad org> wrote:
>> Hi Olav & infra,
>>
>> Given that we don't make the UNCONFIRMED vs NEW distinction in GNOME (AFAIK),
>> can we just remove UNCONFIRMED?
>>
>> behdad
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [Bug 542087] Graphical glitches after "change scroll region"
>> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:44:11 +0000 (UTC)
>> From: vte (bugzilla.gnome.org) <bugzilla gnome org>
>> To: behdad gnome org
>>
>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=542087
>>  vte | VteTerminal | 0.16.x
>>
>> --- Comment #10 from Sebastiano Vigna <vigna dsi unimi it> 2010-07-30 05:44:06
>> UTC ---
>> Well, if that's reproduced why is it that after six months the bug is still
>> "unconfirmed"? ;)
>>
>> --
>> Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
>> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
>> You are on the CC list for the bug.
>> You are watching the QA contact of the bug.
>> You are watching the assignee of the bug.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnome-infrastructure mailing list
>> gnome-infrastructure gnome org
>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
>>
>