Re: git status update?

[Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>]

On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 11:36 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 15:45 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
> > Vincent Untz wrote:
> > 
> > > > If there are improvements to be made, you are going to have to let us
> > > > know what they are :-). (Lars has been extremely responsive upstream.)
> > > 
> > > (forgot to reply to this, sorry)
> > > 
> > > I think I was mainly referring to some minor TODO items from the wiki:
> > > 
> > >  + Remove pagination in repo list (elsewhere?)
> > >  + Fix the sort algorithm for branch and tag names to match GNOME
> > >    conventions. For example, TOMBOY_0_12_0 > TOMBOY_0_8_0.
> > 
> > Speaking of cgit, there is also the Last-Modified header issue I
> > raised in:
> >   http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-infrastructure/2009-February/msg00040.html
> 
> Oh, you weren't Cc'ed on the email conversation with Lars.
> 
> Basically what we decided on doing (and Lars quickly made a patch for)
> was to use the Etag header, which is much easier to provide than
> Last-Modified, and provides simiular functionality.
> 
> I haven't put that patch onto our cgit install, but should be easy.

Done.

- Owen