Re: git status update?
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Frederic Peters <fpeters gnome org>
- Cc: gnome-infrastructure gnome org
- Subject: Re: git status update?
- Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:11:54 -0400
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 11:36 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 15:45 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
> > Vincent Untz wrote:
> >
> > > > If there are improvements to be made, you are going to have to let us
> > > > know what they are :-). (Lars has been extremely responsive upstream.)
> > >
> > > (forgot to reply to this, sorry)
> > >
> > > I think I was mainly referring to some minor TODO items from the wiki:
> > >
> > > + Remove pagination in repo list (elsewhere?)
> > > + Fix the sort algorithm for branch and tag names to match GNOME
> > > conventions. For example, TOMBOY_0_12_0 > TOMBOY_0_8_0.
> >
> > Speaking of cgit, there is also the Last-Modified header issue I
> > raised in:
> > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-infrastructure/2009-February/msg00040.html
>
> Oh, you weren't Cc'ed on the email conversation with Lars.
>
> Basically what we decided on doing (and Lars quickly made a patch for)
> was to use the Etag header, which is much easier to provide than
> Last-Modified, and provides simiular functionality.
>
> I haven't put that patch onto our cgit install, but should be easy.
Done.
- Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]