Re: git status update?

[Santi Béjar <santi agolina net>]

2009/2/27 Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>:
> Le vendredi 27 février 2009, à 09:16 +0100, Santi Béjar a écrit :
>> 2009/2/27 Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>:
>> [...]
>> >
>> >  + migration of docs: we have quite a lot of docs using svn. Eg, if all
>> >   the stuff under http://live.gnome.org/MaintainersCorner is not ready
>> >   to be migrated, that's bad.
>> >   [nearly blocker]
>>
>> These docs only need a direct conversion, so I thought it was more
>> problematic to maintain a copy of these under GitMigration with the
>> conversion than do it right before the conversion. It that's a problem
>> I'll do it before.
>
> Nod. But do we have a list of all such docs on the wiki? Were they
> evaluated? (ie, are they all trivial to update?)
>

Fair enought. I've added a list to the GitMigration page. They are
mostly trivial, and at the very least 6 should be converted in my
opinion. But two of these even if they are "trivial" they should be
proofread by others. Here it is the list:

MaintainersCorner: trivial
MaintainersCorner/Releasing: +/- trivial but local commit + tag + push
+ failure?
ReleasePlanning/MakingARelease: trivial + proofread
AccountPolicy: trivial + proofread
NewSVNRepos: -> NewGitRepos: extra work
Infrastructure: trivial

Santi