Re: Weird status for several modules and releases

[Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net>]

Le mardi 21 avril 2009 à 15:25 +0200, Claude Paroz a écrit :
> Le mardi 21 avril 2009 à 10:14 +0200, Jorge González a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 13:58, Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net> wrote:
> > >
> > >>  and I also noticed few new
> > >> untranslated and fuzzy strings for old releases (both at UI and
> > >> manuals). I tried to update those but it says everything is up to date,
> > >> so I guess is a problem with DL/intltool.
> > >
> > > Please point to real examples if you want me to check for problems.
> > These should be at 100%, at least they were in SVN:
> > 
> > http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/gok/gnome-2-22/po/es
> > http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/gok/gnome-2-22/po/es
> 
> I extracted gok 2.22 branch from SVN and from git, compared the po files
> after an intltool-update, and found out where the differences were:
> 
> diff -u gok-svn/gnome-2-22/gok.desktop.in gok/gok.desktop.in 
> --- gok-svn/gnome-2-22/gok.desktop.in	2009-04-21 14:43:26.000000000
> +0200
> +++ gok/gok.desktop.in	2009-04-21 14:45:26.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  [Desktop Entry]
>  Encoding=UTF-8
>  _Name=On-Screen Keyboard
> -_Comment=Type and navigate applications using alternative input devices
> +_Comment=Navigate applications and type using alternative input devices
>  Exec=gok
>  Terminal=false
>  Type=Application
> 
> 
> > http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/evolution/gnome-2-24/help/es
> > http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/evolution/gnome-2-22/help/es
> > http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/evolution/gnome-2-20/help/es
> > http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/evolution/gnome-2-18/help/es
> > 
> > http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/gnome-user-docs/gnome-2-22/accessibility-guide/es
> > 
> > http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/eog/gnome-2-18/po/es
> 
> eog.glade is even not in the same directory in svn or git gnome-2-18
> branches. But there is an origin/gnome-2-18_svn3671 branch which might
> explain some import problem...
> 
> > http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/gnome-volume-manager/gnome-2-18/po/es
> > 
> > http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/gnome-terminal/gnome-2-20/help/es
> > 
> > http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/sound-juicer/gnome-2-20/po/es
> > 
> 
> I didn't explore all problematic modules above, but this shows that the
> git migration seems not entirely trustable :-(

Reading the blog post of Kristian, it seems sysadmins are considering
the GNOME git migration complete.

What about the problems reported above? Do you consider differences in
old branches as non critical?

Compare e.g.:
http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gok/tree/gok.desktop.in?h=gnome-2-22
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gok/branches/gnome-2-22/gok.desktop.in?revision=2537&view=markup

or:
http://git.gnome.org/cgit/eog/tree/?h=gnome-2-18
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/eog/branches/gnome-2-18/

Don't get me wrong, I really appreciate the huge work done for the
migration, but I'm still a little surprised there seems to be no
comparison between before and after state of the content.

Claude