Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Scott James Remnant <scott canonical com>
- Cc: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>, gnome-infrastructure <gnome-infrastructure gnome org>, Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>, Garrett LeSage <garrett novell com>, "Zeeshan Ali \(Khattak\)" <zeenix gmail com>, desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:54:23 +0200
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 09:36 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 23:13 +0200, Garrett LeSage wrote:
>
> > In fact, you probably should have a file which would be updated as
> > developers churn along (distributing the effort over time), where each
> > big notable feature/bugfix/etc. is recorded as a line in the file
> > whenever it officially lands.
> >
> This is basically what I do. I put the file at the top-level and called
> it ChangeLog.
That's generally what NEWS is for.
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
