On 10/01/2016 10:04:05 AM Sat, Peter Bloomfield wrote:
Hi Claude:
On 09/30/2016 05:21:49 PM Fri, Claude Paroz wrote:
Le 30. 09. 16 à 17:24, Piotr Drąg a écrit :
2016-09-30 12:29 GMT+02:00 Daniel Mustieles García <daniel mustieles gmail com>:
Hi all,
We are monitoring the branch "Gtk3" for Balsa in DL, which has not movement
since 2012, and has problems generating doc statistics. It makes sense to
have this branch in DL?
We also have linked this branck to the extra moduleset, instead of "master".
I think we should change this, removing the gtk3 branch and just monitoring
master branch.
What do you think about this?
Hi Daniel,
gtk3 is actually the current development branch for balsa, as
confirmed by the maintainer:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2016-September/ msg00041.html
Hopefully, the docs problem will be fixed soon.
Note that my answer in the above thread may not have reached Peter, as his provider is blocking my email domain.
Claude
Thanks for pointing that out! Somehow I missed your reply on the list, too :(
I need to simplify Makefile.am to use explicit lists--shouldn't take long, when I get an hour or two.
The other thing we need to do with Balsa is make a stable gtk2 branch and get development back into master. We've been using the gtk3 branch for so long that I'm not looking forward to merging it back into master, but it needs to be done...
The gtk3 branch has now been merged into master, and development will now continue in master. I've also changed Makefile.am to list HELP_FILES explicitly, which I hope will fix the statistics issue.
Thanks,
Peter
_______________________________________________
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n