Re: Transifex instance for GNOME

[Jorge González González <aloriel gmail com>]

> I was about to say some thing along these lines, but you summarised it
> better than what I would have done. I just want to added that every time
> I use Transifex I find its UI very confusing and things that can be
> simply achieved with damned-lies are either impossible or done in a very
> convoluted way. I fail to say what features Transifex offers that we
> need; we neither need the complex multi-project multi-team
> multi-workflow setup nor the near useless online translation tool (if we
> ever need one, then IMHO only Pootle is worthy consideration currently).
I agree with most of what has been written before, but I'd like to make
a call to see what functionalities do we miss in l10n:
* commiting files from the web interface
* sycn between projects not hosted in git.gnome.org

What else?

Claude already said that the first point was already being discussed.

Could you please refresh my mind about other points?

Thanks.
-- 
Jorge González González <aloriel gmail com>
Weblog: http://aloriel.no-ip.org
Fotolog: http://www.flickr.com/photos/aloriel