Re: [+gnome] Re: New Language
- From: James Johnson <james johnson327 gmail com>
- To: Wouter Bolsterlee <uws xs4all nl>
- Subject: Re: [+gnome] Re: New Language
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:08:04 -0500
I would start a translation team for it, if a posting could be made on the teams page.
James
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Wouter Bolsterlee
<uws xs4all nl> wrote:
2009-02-03 klockan 09:53 skrev Mohammad Foroughi:
> What if it was a fake language?
Is *is* a fake, or actually, a constructed language.
> Why you must let a translation team for a language with no use be started?
> How you guarantee that it will not be misused?
There is no translation team, and none will be started I think. I was just
saying that noting "hey here's a language you might not have heard about"
won't magically make Gnome available in that language... :)
— Wouter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: This message was signed/encrypted using GnuPG.
iD8DBQFJiAd6P7QTTiUKY+sRAiqJAKCTdCgU2NTyurSj5RQMxhRXZNgPQQCeNpEb
xTxrpY0LKIiG4ioBNO+6e9Y=
=c+FL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]