Re: seahorse and seahorse-plugins



On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 08:13:20PM +0000, Stef wrote:
> Claude Paroz wrote:
> > The misunderstanding might be about the so-called "satisfactory way".
> > For me, placing a module in the same level as "branches, tags, trunk" of
> > another module is *not* a  satisfactory way, even if the two modules are
> > related. But this should be probably a svn masters policy.
> 
> We waited for months for the SVN dump of the repository as the first
> step in doing this the 'proper' way. That is, clone the repository and
> split the project from that point on, so that history is not lost.

svnsync will mirror a repos.

-- 
Regards,
Olav


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]