Re: switch from context to msgctxt?



having a context in all msgid it's not always useful, but for some
languges it could be useful

for instance, in Catalan we distinguish if you "open folder" it refers
to a concret folder (i.e. you have already had chosen one and it's a
button to open it) or an un-concret one (i.e. it's a button that launch
the file chooser dialog)

I'm not arguing for "context-in-every-msgid" but just point out that
maybe "duplicates" for one language aren't duplicates in another

l10n it's not easy :)

my 2 cents :)

El dj 24 de 01 del 2008 a les 09:42 +0100, en/na Kenneth Nielsen va
escriure:
> Hey Andre
> I had a look at the wiki page and all looks good I think. I recently
> proofread a KDE po-file and discovered something disconcerting. In
> this file it _seemed_ that these contexts had been automatically
> generated and the context provided was simply the name of the kind of
> widget or GUI-element they were in, (they could off course also have
> been made by hand in this way, which makes it even more strange). This
> meant that several strings which certainly did not need have it, had
> several dublicates. Obviously we want to make sure that none of our
> developers get this kind of idea. So my question: Do we think there is
> enough of a risk that some gnome-devs have an idea like that, so that
> it is necessary to mention it somewhere (remember I only saw it in one
> file), or, if it is not very likely we can just wait and see, and take
> the problem if it arises. 
> Regards Kenneth Nielsen
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
-- 
gil forcada

[ca] guifi.net - una xarxa lliure que no para de créixer
[en] guifi.net - a non-stopping free network
bloc: http://gil.badall.net



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]