Re: library.gnome.org questions (broken markup?, generation date)

["Satoru SATOH" <satoru satoh gmail com>]

Hi,

2007/8/20, Simos Xenitellis <simos lists googlemail com>:
> Hi All,
> I think library.gnome.org is amazing. It helps a lot at least to
> motivate new users.
>
> I have two questions:
> a. It looks to me that some mark-up is not closed properly. Therefore,
> in normal paragraph text you get the annoying underline/blue colour
> feature as if an <a href=".. was not close properly.
> It does not look to be due to incomplete translations.

It may not be XHTML tagging errors, I think.

As far as I know, these XHTML documents are generated from XML
(po -> XML) with XSL-T and XSLT does not generate invalid XML as usual.

It seems original (English) ones have the problems

http://library.gnome.org/users/gnotravex/2.19/usage.html
http://library.gnome.org/users/file-roller/stable/file-roller-modify-contents.html

and I guess the cause is in its css.
(see these web pages without css)

Thanks,
Satoru SATOH

> Some examples:
> http://library.gnome.org/users/gnotravex/2.19/usage.html.el
> (second and third para of 2.1.1, first para of 2.1.2)
> http://library.gnome.org/users/file-roller/stable/file-roller-modify-contents.html.de
> (many locations)
> b. For Greek, the Keyboard Indicator Manual has been translated fully
> and DOC_LINGUAS has "el" in it,
> http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-applets/trunk/gswitchit/help/Makefile.am?view=markup
> However, at
> http://library.gnome.org/users/index.html.el
> it appears are untranslated.
> It shows fully translated at
> http://l10n.gnome.org/languages/el/gnome-2-20
> On the same page there is no warning of a screw-up with the markup of
> the translation.
> I think it would be good to have a generation date for the HTML files,
> either towards the footnote, or in the header of the HTML document.
> Would that help?
>
> Simos