Re: Weekly translation status for Gnome 2.12

[Terance Edward Sola <terance lyse net>]

fre, 03,.06.2005 kl. 20.41 +0200, skrev Christian Rose:
> fre 2005-06-03 klockan 20:33 +0200 skrev Terance Edward Sola:
> > fre, 03,.06.2005 kl. 04.35 +0200, skrev danilo gnome org:
> > > Translation status changes from 2005-05-26 to 2005-06-02.
> > > Total message count has changed from 40565 to 33034.
> > > 
> > > Average change during this period was -0.990%.
> > > 
> > > Top 5 movers of the week: 
> > >   * Chinese Simplified (up 13.44%, now supported)
> > >   * Macedonian (up 7.23%, partially supported)
> > >   * Norwegian Bookmal (up 2.68%, supported)
> > >   * Bulgarian (up 1.81%, supported)
> > >   * Malayalam (up 1.29%, unsupported)
> > 
> > I think it would be useful to have stats for HEAD as well. Would it be a
> > lot of work to hack it up for HEAD as well, or do people think it's not
> > useful since stuff in extra/office/fifth-toe isn't part of the GNOME
> > core?
> 
> IMO that's basically the case, yes. Having statistics by mail for the
> core GNOME release makes a lot a sense. Having statistics by mail for
> every single application out there that happens to use GNOME CVS is
> probably overkill. Some application in extras might not even work, while
> some others are very mature. The point is that extras is in many ways a
> moving target with the modules varying very much in quality, so whether
> the status is 80% or 90% or 85% should not be very relevant, at least
> not relevant enough in my opinion to warrant emailed statistics on the
> list.
> 
> But that's just my opinion.
> 
> 
> Christian
> 

I didn't know that extras e.g. was so flakey. I'll capitulate :)

Cheers