Re: gnome-utils ported to gnome-doc-utils
- From: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com>
- To: Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>
- Cc: gnome-i18n <gnome-i18n gnome org>, gnome-doc <gnome-doc-list gnome org>, GNOME Utils <gnome-utils-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: gnome-utils ported to gnome-doc-utils
- Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 16:16:32 +0100
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 14:34 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 18:39 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> > I'd be very glad if anyone "in the know" about gnome-doc-utils could
> > verify that the porting has been done right.
> Hi Emmanuele,
> I grabbed gnome-utils from CVS and checked it over. I don't seem
> to be able to compile gnome-utils on this machine at the moment,
> probably because I'm missing some new development goodness. But
> I can run autogen/configure (which might mean your configure checks
> aren't strict enough).
There was a problem with my last commit - but now it should be fixed.
> Anyway, I was able to run make and make check in all three help
> directories. I manually looked over your source and build files,
> as well as the files gnome-doc-utils generates, and everything
> really looks fine. If make distcheck passes for you, then you
> probably have everything right. The gnome-doc-utils stuff is
> very strict about check and distcheck.
I had to add the 'm4' directory to EXTRA_DIST inside the top-level
Makefile.am, otherwise distcheck would fail; I've added a warning for
this on the MigrationHowto wiki page, since it might easily be
forgotten, especially by people without great auto-fu like myself :-).
Anyway, now gnome-utils compiles fine and passes check && distcheck.
Emmanuele Bassi - <ebassi gmail com>
] [Thread Prev