On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 21:34 +0200, Christian Rose wrote: [...] > > > > We were using the CVS HEAD version of intltool some months ago to fix a > > big bug in intltool until we got a new release. Should I stop doing it > > in the future? (as soon as a normal version is released I stop using the > > CVS version. > > In my opinion yes. Otherwise we'll just have the "status pages shows one > thing, and (latest stable) intltool does another" confusion. The > translation status pages should simply show what the latest stable > intltool release does at all times to avoid any such confusion. We > already have enough confusion when the translation status pages suddenly > don't show what translators expect from their own runs of intltool. Ok. -- Carlos Perellà MarÃn Debian GNU/Linux Sid (PowerPC) Linux Registered User #121232 mailto:carlos pemas net || mailto:carlos gnome org http://carlos.pemas.net Valencia - Spain
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part