On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 20:49 +0200, Christian Rose wrote: [...] > As a side note of this discussion, it would probably be useful if we > could discuss intltool issues in terms of releases instead of something > vague and everchanging such as "CVS HEAD". I certainly hope that noone > never uses intltool CVS HEAD for anything but testing, and uses the > latest stable release for any serious translation work. I certainly hope > that the translation status pages uses nothing but the latest stable > intltool release, and *never* CVS HEAD of intltool. The translation > status pages should show what any translator should see if running > intltool themselves, using the latest stable release. We were using the CVS HEAD version of intltool some months ago to fix a big bug in intltool until we got a new release. Should I stop doing it in the future? (as soon as a normal version is released I stop using the CVS version. > > Christian > Cheers. -- Carlos Perellà MarÃn Debian GNU/Linux Sid (PowerPC) Linux Registered User #121232 mailto:carlos pemas net || mailto:carlos gnome org http://carlos.pemas.net Valencia - Spain
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part