Status page HEAD category?
- From: Adam Weinberger <adamw magnesium net>
- To: gnome-i18n gnome org
- Subject: Status page HEAD category?
- Date: 14 Apr 2004 16:27:31 -0400
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:27:31 -0400
It'd be neat to have a separate category for HEAD in addition to 2.4 and
2.6.
The way it seems to work at this point is that the 2.6 category is the
most up-to-date category, until 2.8 becomes the current category.
What if, instead, there were a separate HEAD category, and it always
contained the development branch. Then, it could be copied into a 2.8
category once 2.8 branchpoints are tagged.
As it is, I cannot see offhand if there have been string changes in the
HEAD branches of anything that's already laid 2.6 tags.
I'm curious what others think about this?
# Adam
--
Adam Weinberger
adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org
adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org
http://www.vectors.cx
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]