Re: Which is the state of my proposal of use bugzilla?

[Carlos Perelló Marín <carlos gnome-db org>]

El d_ 01 Aug 2001 13:50:03 +0100, Michael Twomey escribi_
> Hi,
> 	Looking at the examples I see the problems you are talking about.
> 
> The main issues I see are:
> 
> 1. Email notification
> We could use the language aliases as the default "assigned to" so the 
> bugs got mailed to those. Or special aliases could be set up under the 
> gnome.org tree (actually why isn't there an l10n-es@gnome.org anyway? 
> Seems useful to me to have an 'official' alias :)).
> 
> 2. Product/Component/Version
> I think using the Version as an identifier other than the version of 
> Gnome is a bad idea since it defeats the point of having the version 
> number. I think it is important that people can log against Gnome 2.0, 
> 1.4 or CVS since it makes it much easier to track down the bug/missing 
> translation if you know which version of the software you are dealing with.
> 
> I can see a few possibilities here or breaking up the names:
> 
> Product | Module
> a. gnome-libs, etc. | l10n-de, l10n-es...
> b. Localization | l10n-all, l10n-de, l10n-es...
> c. l10n-de, l10n-es... | gnome-libs, gnome-core...
> 
> I favour option (b) since I think it balances neatly between having too 
> much mail from very broad categories and having too many categories 
> which makes tracking/logging/finding bugs hard.
> 
> 


Excuse me, I forgot to send an email here. Yesterday, Chema, kmaraas and
me were talking about this issue at IRC.


We decide use the option (c) but only with the more active projects and
if we see that the users notify its bugs there and use
bugzilla/bug-buddy, then this configuration will be useful. If those
test "products" are not used, then we should use something like option
(b).

> Any thoughts?
> 

Sorry for the delay.

> mick
> 
> 
> Carlos Perelló Marín wrote:
> 
> > El d_ 31 Jul 2001 16:32:54 +0100, Michael Twomey escribi_
> > 
> >>Hi,
> >>	Does anyone know what has happened with this? Have the categories been 
> >>set up or are there still problems?
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Well, Chema has said me that he does not have any idea how to solve our
> > problem :-(
> > 
> > 
> > I'm playing with bugzilla now and I have seen two possibilities:
> > 
> > This one:
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58343
> > 
> > Or this one:
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58344
> > 
> > We only have one problem. The email notification :-(, we can only have
> > one email address.
> > 
> > Other possibility could be to had other l10n specific bugzilla...
> > 
> > 
> > Ideas?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >>thanks,
> >>	Michael
> >>
> >>Carlos Perelló Marín wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>El d_ 21 Jul 2001 12:58:00 -0500, Chema Celorio escribi_
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>On 21 Jul 2001 19:55:10 +0200, Carlos Perelló Marín wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>I don't think so, but we could put all the modules inside l10n-es.
> >>>>>>Will that work for translators ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>I don't know what are you telling me exactly...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Perhaps are you telling me that we could use something like a symbolic
> >>>>>link?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>I mean that we can put all the translation bugs for each locale in a
> >>>>component and not need to have one component for each module. So you
> >>>>will have Transltions->es Translations->it and inside each component
> >>>>translation bugs for all programs.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>This way, how could we get our bugs? I mean, If I'm only translating the
> >>>Ximian Setup Tools, Could I get only my bugs if we put all bugs at the
> >>>same level?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>gnome-i18n mailing list
> >>>>gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> >>>>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>--
> >>>Carlos Perelló Marín
> >>>mailto:carlos@gnome-db.org
> >>>mailto:carlos@hispalinux.es
> >>>http://www.gnome-db.org
> >>>http://www.Hispalinux.es
> >>>Valencia - Spain
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>gnome-i18n mailing list
> >>>gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> >>>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>-- 
> >>Michael Twomey
> >>These opinions are my own and do not represent Sun unless otherwise stated.
> >>Sun Microsystems, Dublin, 8199164, x19164
> >>"Fly my little Makefiles! Fly!"
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>gnome-i18n mailing list
> >>gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> >>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
> >>
> >>
> > --
> > Carlos Perelló Marín
> > mailto:carlos@gnome-db.org
> > mailto:carlos@hispalinux.es
> > http://www.gnome-db.org
> > http://www.Hispalinux.es
> > Valencia - Spain
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-i18n mailing list
> > gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Michael Twomey
> These opinions are my own and do not represent Sun unless otherwise stated.
> Sun Microsystems, Dublin, 8199164, x19164
> "Fly my little Makefiles! Fly!"
> 
--
Carlos Perelló Marín
mailto:carlos@gnome-db.org
mailto:carlos@hispalinux.es
http://www.gnome-db.org
http://www.Hispalinux.es
Valencia - Spain