Re: gnome-hackers moderation



On 02/17/2010 01:29 PM, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le mercredi 17 février 2010, à 19:21 +0100, Olav Vitters a écrit :
>> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 02:33:35PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
>>> Le jeudi 14 mai 2009, à 21:40 -0400, Gregory Leblanc a écrit :
>>>> What is the plan for handing security type messages that currently
>>>> show up to a private mirror of the gnome-hackers subscribers list?
>>>> Err, I guess if you're unfamiliar with how it works, that might not
>>>> make sense.  Should I post a refresher explanation here, for the folks
>>>> who may have forgotten?
>>>
>>> FWIW, I still think that security-type messages should go to some
>>> security gnome org alias, where people would forward the issue to the
>>> relevant maintainers -- this was already discussed in the past.
>>>
>>> And you get a nice bonus that this new alias (or private mailing list,
>>> if you prefer) has an explicit name that outsiders can easily find.
>>
>> Can someone expand on above? I'm planning to kill gnome-hackers mailing
>> list asap.
> 
> I suggest you just create security as a private mailing list, and
> populate it with 5 random people. They'll make sure to have the right
> people instead of them ;-)

Or just go to board.  Then you wouldn't have to bother about keeping that list
of people up to date.  I think security@ is going to board right now.  That
makes me sleep easier at nights.

behdad

> Vincent
> 


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]