Re: Subversion migration.
- From: Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>
- To: Sriram Ramkrishna <sri aracnet com>
- Cc: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>, Hacking Gnomes <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Subversion migration.
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 23:22:06 -0400
On 5/5/05, Sriram Ramkrishna <sri aracnet com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 04:06:15PM -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> > Hello,
> > KDE moved to Subversion, news on Slashdot.
> If we moved to Arch, I bet we would make even bigger news on slashdot ;)
FWIW, for those not there, the big argument made by the pro-arch camp
at the boston summit was that svn was merely incremental improvement
over cvs while arch had the potential to really change how we do
things. I can't really speak to that one way or the other, not really
having used either, but that is just the background.
> > My impression from the discussion at the Boston Gnome Summit is that
> > some people want to try out some experimental source code control
> > projects.
> I think most of us in the 'arch' camp really don't have any big
> objection to subversion.
I believe there was an objection from the core arch/bazaar folks at
LCA on this issue. Apparently there are established tools to export
from CVS, and not so much for SVN, which at this time makes it a bit
of a one-way street. But I may be misremembering.
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
] [Thread Prev