Re: Announcing the GNOME 2.2.0 Desktop and Developer Platform

[Sander Vesik <sander_traveling yahoo co uk>]

Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 17:17, Sander Vesik wrote:
>
> > Jeff Waugh wrote:
> >
> > > <quote who="Laurent Vivier">
> > >
> > > > In the release note of 2.2.0, GNOME 2.2.0 Installation Order, we can read
> > > > that gnome-common is needed, but it is not in sources.
> > > >
> > > > Where is the problem ?
> > >
> > >
> > > gnome-common is not required at all, it's a mistake in the release notes.
> >
> > This is not true - neither gnome-2.2 nor gnome HEAD is buildable without 
> > gnome-autogen.sh which comes from gnome-common. At least not from CVS.
>
> released tarballs shouldn't need that gnome-autogen.sh.

Its not a terribly useful list (and one not reusable for the stable 
branches) if it is only meant to be for tarballs

> cheers



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers