Re: BETA 3: Where have all the tarballs gone?

[Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>]

On 26 Mar 2002, Luis Villa wrote:

> On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 11:02, Sander Vesik wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > We have received remarkably little in the way of released tarballs for this
> > > week's beta release. It's now Tuesday in every corner of the planet, but
> > > TARBALLS ARE DUE ON MONDAY.
> > > 
> > > If you have not released updated tarballs of your modules, please reply to
> > > this email. We will accept one of the following answers:
> > > 
> > >   - "I/we have not fixed any bugs."
> > > 
> > 
> > We will accept this one????
> 
> And what do you suggest we do in this case exactly, Sander? At least

Complain loudly.

> some modules are stable and don't need fixing at this time, and in cases
> where that isn't the case, there isn't much to do except publicly shame

In which case they can say so and point at previous tarballs - entirely
different case altogether 8-)

> the relevant parties :) there isn't really any 'accepting' or rejecting
> to be done...
>
> Luis
> 

	Sander

	I see a dark sail on the horizon
	Set under a dark cloud that hides the sun
	Bring me my Broadsword and clear understanding

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers