Re: Build sheriff proposal ...

[Chris Chabot <chabotc reviewboard com>]

Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
> Might I suggest that a similar policy is adopted for the SPEC files in
> CVS for all GNOME modules. If the SPEC don't include some files it
> should anyone with the needed skills are allowed to add them without
> sending a patch to mailing-lists etc. Chris Chabot is doing some great
> work updating the SPEC's to work with GNOME 2.0 now, so it would be a
> shame if they became unworkable again because the maintainer of module X
> didn't use RPMS and due to that didn't bother to keep it up to date with
> changes.

That would be a very nice way to solve the situation.

I am done with my work for the spec files, as i got them all done, 
polished up and shiney waiting for adoption.

(hint: if anyone wants to preempt this policicy, send me an email for 
which module you need a new spec).

Also, if anyone could set me up with a CVS account so i can commit the 
desired fixes (read: where the maintainer allows changes to the .spec 
files) that would help out a lot.

If required, you can also add me as maintainer for the packaging 
subcomponent for your module.

Hope we get this done before gnome2 final ;-)

	-- Chris



_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers