On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 07:29, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Seth, > > I was wondering why you added 'gob' to HEAD gnome-vfs via some CVS > include ? [ I know this is for Gnome 2.2 but ... ] > > That's really two questions; > > a) why did you add gob ? Because we want to use GObject in GnomeVFS now and GOB is a sensible way of writing GObjects (not the only sensible way, but one of them). > > b) why did you add it into the module using a CVS include > instead of starting a discussion about including it in > the dependency stack ? I asked Seth this too and aparently thats what George recommended. Are you complaining that we didn't add a dependancy? ;-) Ian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part