Re: GtkHtml 1, 2 and 1->2
- From: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- To: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
- Cc: Gediminas Paulauskas <menesis delfi lt>, Mikael Hallendal <micke codefactory se>, Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>, Radek Doulík <rodo ximian com>, GNOME Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>, Larry Ewing <lewing ximian com>
- Subject: Re: GtkHtml 1, 2 and 1->2
- Date: 15 Apr 2002 14:14:47 +0100
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 11:39, Bill Haneman wrote:
> I think DV has some good arguments RE the architecture of gtkhtml2.
One thing I'm not clear on is why using 'DOM' ( apart from the obvious
TLA benefits =) is a good idea at all ? I understand that some scripting
( JavaScript ? ) uses a similar structure, and thus it's easier to
support scripting but ...
Things might have changed, but is the DOM used successfully in any
non-web browser ? I remember it being mooted ( I think ) as a global
document module solution to every problem, did that happen or not ?
Also; it seems to me there is a world of difference between providing
an interface that complies with the spec, and actually storing the data
using that object model.
What's the story these days ? and why do we need DOMness ?
Regards,
Michael.
--
mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]