Re: GNOME 2.0 Schedule

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Stephen Browne <stephen browne sun com> writes: 
> I don't have a problem with this, these small changes are not what I would
> call significant UI changes.  Also I understand that any large changes will
> always have a really good reason for them.  I guess I would just like to see
> us make these large changes now before 2.0.  Give the UI some importance;
> we are breaking just about everything else about GNOME from 1.4 to 2.0
> so lets get the big UI changes out of the way at the same time? NO?

I'd agree with the idea that we should get the UI changes done
ASAP. But, the way I'd approach it is to make the UI changes, and have
them done in time, rather than to move the release date. ;-)

Havoc

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers