Re: GNOME 2.0 Schedule
- From: Jamin Philip Gray <jgray writeme com>
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>
- Cc: Iain <iain ximian com>, Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik sun com>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Stephen Browne <stephen browne sun com>, <gnome-2-0-list gnome org>, <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME 2.0 Schedule
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 15:50:28 -0500 (CDT)
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> On 10Oct2001 01:41PM (-0400), Iain wrote:
> >
> > > * sawfish
> > > * nautilus
> > > * control center
> > > * non-deprectaed parts of gnome-core, gnome-utils and
> > > gnome-applets
> > >
> > > And the g-c, g-u and g-a very definately need a good "is this part merely
> > > completely made of crack or does it actually contain something useful"
> > > lookover. A good deal of their contents definately isn't.
> >
> > (Try 2: My first try was too depressing to finish :)
> >
> > gnome-utils needs made useful. Can we add gnome-games and gnome-media
> > into the list as well?
>
> I'm all for crack removal.
I'll second that...no more crack!
> > We need something like
> > http://developer.kde.org/development-versions/kde-3.0-features.html
> > SOON! (sorry to keep bitching about this, but as dot.kde.org says "With
> > the Qt port out of the way, the KDE developers can now focus on the
> > planned KDE improvements."
>
> One difference is that we do not yet have the Gtk (and other
> underlying libraries) port out of the way yet. What we should learn
> from KDE is that we need to get that done ASAP if there is to be time
> for new features.
Yes. There are many, many things we'd all like to see done to improve GNOME,
but I agree that the right approach is to release GNOME 2 in the current
schedule, which basically means, port. The good news is that there is no
reason in the world we can't release a new version of GNOME (2.0.1 or even
2.2) relatively soon after 2.0. Shorter release cycles would be good, I
think.
> That being said, it would be good to collect a list of the features we
> already know we will have, based on what has been done in the base
> libraries.
Absolutely. It's often very small things, such as the default look and feel
that add so much polish to a release. There are a lot of user-visible things
we can do that don't take a lot of work, some of which have already been done.
----------------------------------------------------
name: Jamin Philip Gray
email: jgray writeme com
icq: 1361499
aim: jamingray47
web: http://DoLinux.dyn.dhs.org
If you're going to walk on thin ice you may as well dance.
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]