Re: GNOME 2.0 Schedule
- From: Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>
- To: gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME 2.0 Schedule
- Date: 11 Oct 2001 02:58:16 -0700
...and... there have been some significant usability improvements (easy
to hack, yes, but they have very positive effects on usability) to GDM
and some other core components.
-seth
On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 02:53, Seth Nickell wrote:
> > (Nonetheless, I do think replacing the control center, decent keynav,
> > lack of flicker, AA fonts, accessibility, and a few random things that
> > will inevitably happen, will be a noticeable user improvement. Not
>
> plus a number of nice things I'm noticing in GTK... like better warning
> dialogue icons (for the most part, some of them could scare novice
> users), pressing a key to activate a button actually shows it depressing
> (this is surprisingly important!), and general improvements in
> appearance. oh, and lets not forget double buffering...
>
> These are not inconsequential changes, and users *will* notice. I have
> enjoyed having anti-aliasing on my computer a lot, and it will be great
> to have that in mainstream GNOME, and that's just one of many new
> features.
>
> Choosing a more attractive default theme (since of course, we will be
> using metathemes rather than having component specific themes ;-) would
> be another way to significantly improve at least the first impression
> with little effort on our part.
>
> -Seth
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-hackers mailing list
> gnome-hackers gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
>
>
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]