Re: Minimum specs, "funky" defaults, and old machinery
- From: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>
- To: Vladimir Vukicevic <vladimir ximian com>
- Cc: Telsa Gwynne <hobbit aloss ukuu org uk>, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: Minimum specs, "funky" defaults, and old machinery
- Date: 12 Mar 2001 04:57:49 +0100
Vladimir Vukicevic <vladimir ximian com> writes:
> The Eazel recommendations sound mostly sane to me, especially the "64MB
> preferred" part -- I'd probably list it as "64MB preferred (32MB
> minimum)" instead of the other way around. I'm confused about the hard
> disk space section; is it saying that 60MB is a minimum for GNOME? Or
> 300MB? Or is that to build? I'm not exactly sure what the minimum hard
> disk usages are...
My current GNOME 2 build tree, that's basically just gnome-libs and its
dependencies, but no applications at all. However, I enabled maximum
debugging and I'm compiling both shared and static libraries.
(actually, this is glib pango gtk+ gnome-common gnome-xml ORBit oaf gconf
xml-i18n-tools gnome-vfs libart_lgpl gnome-libs libgtop guile-gtk)
$ du -sk /gnome/head/INSTALL/
155424 /gnome/head/INSTALL
To compile this stuff (including object files etc.).
$ du -sk /gnome/head/cvs/
795696 /gnome/head/cvs
My current stable tree, that's with Nautilus, but without Evolution:
(glib libunicode gtk+ ORBit gob gnome-xml libgtop oaf gnet gnome-http gconf
imlib gnome-libs gdk-pixbuf gnome-print xml-i18n-tools bonobo control-center
libglade gnome-vfs gal glibwww2 gtkhtml gnome-core gnome-applets bonobo-conf
eog medusa nautilus libole2 gnumeric gtop)
$ du -sk /gnome/unstable/INSTALL/
387220 /gnome/unstable/INSTALL
To compile this stuff
$ du -sk /gnome/unstable/cvs/
1351144 /gnome/unstable/cvs
All in total:
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdb1 1013871 555861 405634 58% /
/dev/sdb3 3687940 1817540 1683060 52% /usr
/dev/md0 7928232 4126592 3398904 55% /gnome
/dev/hda2 24509976 6236572 17028368 27% /home
/dev/hda1 5116504 2665288 2451216 53% /sidney
I'm not saying this is a reasonable minimum, I'm a core GNOME hacker and I
have a lot of stuff on my machine. So you better see it as a reasonable
maximum (unless you're compiling both Nautilus and Evolution) than a minimum.
--
Martin Baulig
martin gnome org (private)
baulig suse de (work)
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
- References:
- Re: Minimum specs, "funky" defaults, and old machinery
- Re: Minimum specs, "funky" defaults, and old machinery
- Re: Minimum specs, "funky" defaults, and old machinery
- Re: Minimum specs, "funky" defaults, and old machinery
- Re: Minimum specs, "funky" defaults, and old machinery
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]