Re: gnome-libs 2.0 proposal

[jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>]

On 07 Mar 2001 07:30:47 -0500, Elliot Lee wrote:
> 
> 3. WRT branches, the HEAD vs -1-0 thing is a mere technicality. You are
> ultimately going to have to wind up with the new gnome-libs in HEAD,

with this plan we get 3 toplevel modules, which changes this reasoning a
bit.  but, not all that much since there will still need to be some cvs
magic to get the -1-0 gnome-libs into HEAD.

> 4. #2 was going to be about not requiring the whole CORBA complex for apps
> that just want the libgnomeui convenience and utility functions, or
> something.

well, we will be using gconf anyway...

jacob
-- 
"The people who made the Macintosh produced a miracle, but that
 doesn't mean their code was wonderful." -- Bob Cringely

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers