Re: patch for gnome-libs/libgnome (include of gnome-defs.h in files using BEGIN_GNOME_DECLS)

[Mikael Hallendal <micke hallendal net>]

On 28 Feb 2001 23:22:45 -0600, Chema Celorio wrote:
> 
> Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > 
> > Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com> writes:
> > > > > You have totally got to be kidding.  Including gnome.h is a royal PITA
> > > > > and blows out compile times something chronic.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agreed, but including the individual headers doesn't work properly and
> > > > was never tested before we released.
> > >
> > > I usually include the individual headers, and I do include
> > > gnome-defs.h manually before they are used.
> > >
> > > I dont think this patch will cause any major problems.
> > 
> > I'm simply explaining why James said including them individually isn't
> > supported; because it's been broken for 2 years.
> 
> Do we _NEED_ to include this patch at this point ?
> 
> I don't think we should. I can see scenarios that this can cause
> problems. If as a developer I code on the gnome-libs with the 
> patch that includes the other headers for me, my app might not
> compile in a previous version of g-libs that didn't included
> headers for me. 
> 
> Yes it is broken but I don't think this is the time to fix it.
> 
> Chema

I would say including this in the GNOME 2.0 release is a pretty good
time to fix it. Since as I understand (correct
me if I'm wrong) it (together with Gtk+ 2.0) woun't be source-compatible
with Gnome 1.4 + Gtk+ 1.2.X.
If this is so, shouldn't all kind of similar bugs be fixed in the GNOME
2.0 release?

Regards,
Mikael Hallendal


-- 

Mikael Hallendal                micke codefactory se
CodeFactory AB                  http://www.codefactory.se/
Office: +46 (0)8 587 583 05     Cell: +46 (0)709 718 918



_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers