Re: Intolerable CVS behaviour
- From: Almer "S." Tigelaar <almer1 dds nl>
- To: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>
- Cc: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>, kloczek pld org pl, Kjartan Maraas <kmaraas online no>, veillard redhat com, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: Intolerable CVS behaviour
- Date: 26 Feb 2001 21:36:46 +0100
Hi,
> Lets talk programmer-talk. Assertions and pre-conditions in Gtk+ are
> a good example of a mechanical device that can help programmers.
> [snip]...
Ah! Now this makes sense :-) But ACL's only reduce the chance, they
don't eliminate it ofcourse.
> I can think of a few:
>
> * Translators can be given automated tools that would do the
> "right thing" without them having to become CVS experts.
Ok, having this as an optional thing first, so _all_ problems with the
"tools" can be worked out, would
be a good idea.
> * Modules with strict CVS commit rules can be mechanically
> managed, without assuming that everyone will be educated [1]
> on time, or will do the right thing given then chances of
> errors.
Well, now i've heard all this explaining it does not sound too bad.
Anyway, we can never know
if it works better then our current setup if we don't try it...
Thanks for your comments/explanation.
Yours sincerely,
Almer S. Tigelaar
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]