Re: OO as GNOME software (topic change)
- From: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>
- To: seth eazel com
- Cc: hp redhat com (Havoc Pennington), dusk ravendusk org (John R. Sheets), gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: OO as GNOME software (topic change)
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:26:23 -0500 (EST)
> How would anyone gain if we were to reject OO for inclusion in GNOME on
> the basis of it not using GTK+, but never provided any sort of
> "warning"? I don't get a sense that the people making decisions about OO
> have any idea that it is objectional to not use GTK+.
Given the size of star^Wopen office its obvious that this will be a process
so I dont see any point in trying to decide now anyway. We have plenty of time
to discuss criteria and plan what is best, as well as working with the Sun folk
to figure out what the gnome side needs to provide that it may not be
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]