Re: Menus
- From: JR Tipton <nails maybe net>
- To: The Doctor What <docwhat gerf org>
- cc: Khimenko Victor <gnome-gui khim sch57 msk ru>, gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Menus
- Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1998 23:57:13 -0800 (PST)
On Sat, 7 Nov 1998, The Doctor What wrote:
[snip my ramblings about 'why customization isn't the be-all and end-all]
[snip car-to-computer comparison]
> > or whateverelse) that went into the layout of the car works just about
> > fine for me. I can get used to it. I *do* get used to it.
[snip]
> their computers. You make the comparison with a car. I disagree. You
> don't just *drive* your desktop and work evironment, you *live* in it.
Excellent point.
> In my opinoin, a desktop is like a living room. You may redesign the
> furnature, but you do reorganize things. Only hackers try to redesign the
> room and furnature (and power users to a lesser degree, but they prefer
> "modifiable" furnature).
Ah. This, too, is a good point.
[snip convincing antecdotal evidence]
This is what convinces me: the antectodtal evidence. I like it. After
reading your message I remembered many instances of watching people's fear
of "breaking" something get in the way of their desire to customize it...
which has got me thinking a bit off topic and way out in the 'blue sky',
but it got me thinking anyway =) What if there was an ability on a
machine to tell it, "Hey, GNOME/WM/Whatever, I'm going to start screwing
around now and if I screw up, I'd like to return everything to here" that
wasn't just in a simple dialog box? I know you can do these things in a
dialog box, i.e. change settings and cancel if you don't like them, but
what about a more global protection? The basic fear of hurting the
computer hinders and restricts many people...
(Well written message, BTW.)
William R. Tipton
nails@maybe.net
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]