Re: Standard fonts.
- From: raster redhat com
- To: effugas best com
- cc: gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Standard fonts.
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 09:02:00 -0400 (EDT)
On 31 Jul, Dan Kaminsky shouted:
-> I've just decided the *single ugliest* part of X is, undoubtedly, the
-> butt-ugly fonts. I think we have two choices for GNOME:
1. the bitch about X fonts isn't really the fonts - X handles scalable
fonts quite ok. its the API to drawing fontsthat sux, the font
specification method and the lack fo alpha channelling leading to lack
of anti-aliasing. Get the freefont and sharefont packs from sunsit and
u'll fund a pile of scaleable fonts - you can even install standard
Type1 fonts and use them... I do.
the font issue is a low-level code issue not one of fonts themselves.
there are plenty of them. Just NVER used fixed (helvetica always turns
out nice.. :) )
->
-> 1) Use the one piece of code Microsoft appears to have released
-> semi-publically: Microsoft Web Fonts. Verdana, Georgia, Times New Roman,
-> and Arial are *good* fonts, and are in fact quite a bit more attractive than
-> the standard fonts I've seen on any other OS.
->
-> 2) Find a font designer to provide us with high quality serif, sans serif,
-> non-proportional, and special case fonts.
->
-> Yes, this is a GNOME issue. Yes, these need to be truetype fonts.
->
-> I think this is absolutely critical, without a doubt in my head.
->
->
--
--------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------------
raster@rasterman.com /\___ /\ ___/||\___ ____/|/\___ raster@redhat.com
Carsten Haitzler | _ //__\\ __||_ __\\ ___|| _ / Red Hat Advanced
218/21 Conner Drive || // __ \\_ \ | | \ _/_|| / Development Labs
Chapel Hill NC 27514 USA ||\\\/ \//__/ |_| /___/||\\ 919 547 0012 ext 282
+1 (919) 929 9443, 801 4392 For pure Enlightenment http://www.rasterman.com/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]