Re: Standard fonts.



On 31 Jul, Dan Kaminsky shouted:
->  I've just decided the *single ugliest* part of X is, undoubtedly, the
->  butt-ugly fonts.  I think we have two choices for GNOME:

1. the bitch about X fonts isn't really the fonts - X handles scalable
fonts quite ok. its the API to drawing fontsthat sux, the font
specification method and the lack fo alpha channelling leading to lack
of anti-aliasing. Get the freefont and sharefont packs from sunsit and
u'll fund a pile of scaleable fonts - you can even install standard
Type1 fonts and use them... I do.

the font issue is a low-level code issue not one of fonts themselves.
there are plenty of them. Just NVER used fixed (helvetica always turns
out nice.. :) )

->  
->  1)  Use the one piece of code Microsoft appears to have released
->  semi-publically:  Microsoft Web Fonts.  Verdana, Georgia, Times New Roman,
->  and Arial are *good* fonts, and are in fact quite a bit more attractive than
->  the standard fonts I've seen on any other OS.
->  
->  2)  Find a font designer to provide us with high quality serif, sans serif,
->  non-proportional, and special case fonts.
->  
->  Yes, this is a GNOME issue.  Yes, these need to be truetype fonts.
->  
->  I think this is absolutely critical, without a doubt in my head.
->  
->  

-- 
--------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------------
raster@rasterman.com       /\___ /\ ___/||\___ ____/|/\___  raster@redhat.com
Carsten Haitzler           | _ //__\\ __||_ __\\ ___|| _ /  Red Hat Advanced
218/21 Conner Drive        || // __ \\_ \ | |   \ _/_|| /   Development Labs
Chapel Hill NC 27514 USA   ||\\\/  \//__/ |_|   /___/||\\   919 547 0012 ext 282
+1 (919) 929 9443, 801 4392   For pure Enlightenment   http://www.rasterman.com/



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]