Re: Why cluehunting ?
- From: Stephan Pfab <pfab thales mathematik uni-ulm de>
- To: "Dan \"Effugas\" Kaminsky" <effugas best com>
- Cc: <gnome-gui-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Why cluehunting ?
- Date: 20 Aug 1998 13:02:45 +0200
"Dan \"Effugas\" Kaminsky" <effugas@best.com> writes:
> >summary:
> > completion good
> > autocompletion bad
> >
> What do you think of inactive automatic expansion? (Not completion, because
> sometimes you aren't adding to the end). Inactive means the computer has to
> be told to accept the new possibility before it does the replace.
>
> Maybe a green underline under a word would signify the computer thinks it
> can do better?
>
Yes. Suggestions are ok. They still should be optional.
I think about the "KUKA" "KUBA" example.
If I could not turn off the nagging "change KUKA to KUBA"
I would really annoyed.
Stephan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]