Re: Whitespace (was: Re: GNOME Compliance Labels)
- From: Bowie Poag <bjp primenet com>
- To: "Dan \"Effugas\" Kaminsky" <effugas best com>
- cc: gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Whitespace (was: Re: GNOME Compliance Labels)
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 17:26:09 -0700 (MST)
> >Stictly on the whitespace issue, I'm with you on this one. Whitespace
> >makes a *huge* difference in how professional or polished a program
> >looks. It can also be used to line up widgets into columns, which when
> >done properly, eases the eye's journey around the window. I've got some
> >links a professor of mine had made up about this--I'll have to go dig
> >them up. And translate them into English. :)
Agreed.
>
>
> Windows apps, in general, have less whitespace than almost every Unix app.
> Yes, I'll say that to that degree of certainty. And you know what? They
> look better. There's a *reason* Windows 3.1 looks like crap compared to 95.
>
> I was thinking about making some big huge post about how more whitespace
> looks worse. But why should I? That's what mockups are for.
Doubly agreed. :)
Bowie
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]