Re: A letter for Tom/RGSG contributors
- From: Bowie Poag <bjp primenet com>
- To: John R Sheets <dusk smsi-roman com>
- cc: Soren Harward <soren cinternet net>, Gnome GUI List <gnome-gui-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: A letter for Tom/RGSG contributors
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 15:12:58 -0700 (MST)
> You're right, of course, Soren, and I apologize for the flame
> bait. I still stand by my opinions in this matter, but my words
> should have been better chosen.
>
> However, the fact remains that the RSG was a passive,
> *non*-competing effort, despite what Bowie has said, and I am
> very disappointed that Bowie is not taking his own advice. At
> the very least, he should stop making proposals for the UISG, and
> should concentrate on fitting his ideas into the *new* official
> format, the GNOME User Interface Guidelines. This
> cross-development is leading to the same confusion about how
> *which* issues are handled by *which* style guide. If something
> is decided for the UISG, does it make it into the GUIG? Will we
> have to ratify every style twice?
The reason why we're moving ahead, is because theres no reason for us to
stop -- And more importantly, somebody has to do it. Our intent is not to
overrun Federico aand give him more work than he can handle -- Its merely
to give him a document he can rely upon, to do with whatever he wishes.
Once the document is done, we're done.
>
> I understand that Bowie intends to merge the UISG into the GUIG
> when it's ready (mid-October?), but why wait that long? Why
> create an interim period of confusion, just to support a document
> that will disappear in a couple months anyway? We should be
> focusing all our efforts on the single format contained in the
> official GNOME User Interface Guidelines document.
I do NOT intent on merging the UISG into the GUIG -- Thats not my
decision, thats Federicos. I can certainly suggest it, but I cant really
force anything like that to happen. The only thing I, and we can do, as
contributors and maintainers, is to form a document so solid that Federico
would be crazy not to use it, at least in some way. :)
>
> This is still an important issue, even though the RSG part of it
> has been resolved. Bottom line, we still have two style guides.
>
> John
Nope. We have one official Style Guide project being maintained by
Federico,and we have one un-official document which will offer a few
suggestions. Thats all we're doing here.. And had Tom not come along to
blow the focus X number of weeks ago, we would have been doing the same
exact thing, as always. Building a suggested document for public
consumption, review, and eventual release. Business as usual, as far as
i'm concerned. I really wish Tom would have just continued development
somewhere else, instead of dropping his project completely.
Bowie
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]