Re: PROPOSAL: UISG Menu Line Standardization
- From: Bowie Poag <bjp primenet com>
- To: Stephan Pfab <pfab thales mathematik uni-ulm de>
- cc: nails maybe net, armistead flex net, gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: UISG Menu Line Standardization
- Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 18:12:56 -0700 (MST)
> >Why not mandate that the edit menu be there anyway? What if it pops down
> >and copy/paste/cut/clear/whatever are disabled? It seems to me that a
> >disabled edit menu makes more sense because, as "consistency is king" (not
> >my phrase), it makes applications consisent.
>
> This is like an advertisment for a product that is not there.
> It would look like a feature which is not yet implemented.
>
> I vote for Edit mandatory, t.i. with Bowies Proposal on that isue.
> But if Edit makes sense it has to be there.
>
> Stephan
Exactly. If |Edit| is irrelevant for an application, it shouldn't even be
on the menu bar in the first place..In a situation like that, having
|Edit| there makes about as much sense as |Ride A Pony| ..It makes no
sense, so why do it?
Bowie
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]