Re: PROPOSAL: UISG Menu Line Standardization
- From: JR Tipton <nails maybe net>
- To: Bowie Poag <bjp primenet com>
- cc: Armistead <armistead flex net>, gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: UISG Menu Line Standardization
- Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 16:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
Bowie wrote:
> > > o File, Edit, and View are optional items. Some programs will
> > > never need to load/save files, for example. Some programs
> > > will never need to edit anything. Some programs will never need
> > > to alter the user's view. (?)'marked.
> > I believe Edit to be a mandatory item, as this is the logical place for all
> > cut&paste operations. Every Gnome compliant application should have cut&paste
> > features.
> Cut & Paste operations aren't necessary on crude apps. Take a little
> program which just pops a nice window on your screen with a screenblanker
> running in it. How are you going to cut and paste from a screenblanker?
> Example: xlock -inwindow -mode ifs &
Why not mandate that the edit menu be there anyway? What if it pops down
and copy/paste/cut/clear/whatever are disabled? It seems to me that a
disabled edit menu makes more sense because, as "consistency is king" (not
my phrase), it makes applications consisent.
william r. tipton
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]