Re: PROPOSAL: Compliancy Level Standardization, Revision 1.

["Dan \"Effugas\" Kaminsky" <effugas best com>]

> I think we should name the guidelines with version numbers.  :^)
>So..
>
>G98a-1:
>G98a-2:
>G98a-3:
>...
>
> And then it doesn't matter what order the levels go in.


Well, the order still matters, but damn I DO like this system.  It's just
the space issue, and the year dependance.  Why not GC1v2.0 ?