Re: RGSG
- From: Bowie Poag <bjp primenet com>
- To: Dan Kaminsky <effugas best com>
- cc: Tom Vogt <tom lemuria org>, gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: RGSG
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 09:19:50 -0700 (MST)
> Tom, why don't you look around, there is no single "program menu" idea out
> there, there are like three or four. And there's at LEAST one other person
> on the record who agrees with me.
(For the record, i'm with Dan on this issue. Over the past 10 years or so,
its been a popular practice to throw menu items under submenus where they
really dont belong--due to the fact that there simply wasnt an appropriate
place for them (Example-- "About.." .. under Winblows, its in Help. Under
AmigaDOS, its under file. The new "Program" menu is exactly where it
belongs, along with items such as "How to Register.." , "How to contact
the author", etc.. And its going to take alot to convince me that anything
else is a better idea.
>
> The big points of contention I'm having is that Program shouldn't suck up
> the contents of File, that Program should really just be the
> Gnomeprint(which appears to be the consensus), that both Program *and* File
> deserve to have Exit commands, and that renaming File is a really bad idea.
Agreed. However, it breaks consistancy to have "Exit" in File, and another
"Exit" in Program. Instead, "Exit" belongs in Program, and * "Close" *
belongs under file. "Exit" was also another one of those menu items that
people couldnt really find a good home for. I mean, think about it..
......exiting..a file? :)
Consistancy is king. Remember that.
Bowie
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]