Re: RGSG
- From: Lars Torben Wilson <torben coastnet com>
- To: Tom Vogt <tom lemuria org>
- Cc: gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: RGSG
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 13:59:00 -0700
Tom Vogt writes:
> Dan Kaminsky <effugas@best.com> wrote:
> > Anyway, the *INTERFACE* reason is that Close now can mean:
> > 1) Close WIndow(whatever that means)
> > 2) Close File
> > 3) Close Application
>
> "File"->Close
> and
> "Program"->Exit
>
>
> does anyone see any source of confusion there? I don't. your point is mood,
> dan, exactly BECAUSE of the "Program" menu.
This makes a lot of sense to me. I don't think that too many WinDOS/MacOS
users would be lost in the transistion, either; there are examples of
this sort of menu in both systems.
And yes, at a *code* level, exiting an app does close files. How
many users concern themselves with that, though? Just wondering.
My take on it is: Program deals with the program (although I go for
the Gnomeprint icon, HCI warts and all--see other post). File deals
with the file(s). I think the conceptual split is important and
intuitive.
I'm with you on this one, Tom.
Torben
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]