Re: [gnome-flashback] The case for other WMs (was: Re: [gnome-panel] Pass --session-name from desktop files.)
- From: Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57 ubuntu com>
- To: Mailing list for the Gnome Flashback project <gnome-flashback-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [gnome-flashback] The case for other WMs (was: Re: [gnome-panel] Pass --session-name from desktop files.)
- Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 18:09:03 +0400
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Philipp Kaluza <floss ghostroute eu> wrote:
Is anybody here interested in supporting other WMs except
metacity/mutter ? If so, please speak up now, and make the case for
supporting other WMs.
I personally use Metacity, but I am interested in reducing the Ubuntu
delta, that's why I proposed to add these sessions upstream.
Otherwise, we should make it perfectly clear to downstreams that it is
not OK to ship a "Gnome Flashback (Compiz)" - the Gnome Flashback name
is specifically reserved for a replacement for the old fallback mode.
Let them name it "Gnome + Compiz" or whatever.
I am happy to use any name that we agree on. Last time when I proposed
"GNOME Flashback (with $WM)" scheme, nobody argued against that
(though it was discovered that this string is too long for some DMs).
--
Dmitry Shachnev
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]