Hi Shaun On 2014-12-05 16:07, Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org> wrote:
* Are there any statuses on the list you never use?
When I review, I generally bump things up to the next level of they are "good enough" and have not yet reached final, maybe applying a few tweaks here are there. In that sense, only a few "completeness" statuses would be enough for me, even reduction to a three-level traffic light system would probably be fine. I do not write a great deal of new content, so the "starter" statuses, such as draft, incomplete and stub, seem redundant to me.
* Are any statuses otherwise poorly named? I remember Jim didn't like "outdated" because it was demotivating to have all your stuff called outdated once you release. That might be a place for an additional status. One for "need to check if this is up to date" and one for "we checked and we know it ain't".
I generally mark pages as outdated only at review time, rather than when writing the page, at which point the page could just be stubbed with a comment instead of using a review status.
* What's your favorite kind of cheese?
Wensleydale! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DbnWAID2HXA&t=28m0s -- http://amigadave.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature