Re: Gnome Boxes freeze break request

["Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak gnome org>]

Hi Andre,

On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net> wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 02:02 +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> > While we await the second ack from release-team, I was hoping
> > I can ask for another break:
>
> Please always start a separate thread for a separate request in case you
> expect me to understand, follow, and even reply to your mail.
> In exchange and as a sign of appreciation I might try to avoid dropping
> 15 entirely different bugs in a single Bugzilla ticket about Boxes.

Aye aye, sir!

> > Put wizard & properties in a dialog -
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733367
>
> Small comment about the patches: I'm not totally happy with the line
>   "// This file is part of GNOME Boxes. License: LGPLv2+"
> in the attached patches, but it's not worse than before. IANAL, but IMHO
> every source file should have a proper header with a copyright and
> license notice.

That is nothing new. Thats the convention we have always followed in
Boxes. I tend to follow the general conventions unless I have a good
reason not to so this is not coming from me. Marc-Andre started the
project and he made this decision.

Feel free to file a bug about this and we can certainly think about
changing that for all source files.

> (If .vala files are considered source files.)

What else should they be considered?

> > Designers would love to have this and so would I and Lasse in 3.14
> > already.
>
> Same opinion as Fred: *If* designers have tested this and would like to
> see it, here is another r-t approval.

As I said, they have not tested this but they do want it. Putting
Jakub and Allan in CC to give their opinions.

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
________________________________________
Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/