Re: [Mallard] Add new element to lists which doesn't require a child block element

[Phil Bull <philbull gmail com>]

Hi Milo,

On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 14:27 +0200, Milo Casagrande wrote:
> It will absolutely be easier to write, but it could end up being more
> "difficult" to read the code. Can't we just suppress the <p> from
> <item> and have it optional in case we need it? (like two paragraphs
> in an item) If there's no <p>, treat it like there's one...

I thought about that, but I was worried about allowing bare strings and
block elements inside the same parent element. Maybe that's not a
problem, though.

Thanks,

Phil

-- 
Phil Bull
https://launchpad.net/people/philbull