Re: Meaning of "getting started"
- From: "Pedro de Medeiros" <pedrovmm+lists gmail com>
- To: "Shaun McCance" <shaunm gnome org>
- Cc: GNOME Documentation <gnome-doc-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Meaning of "getting started"
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:00:41 -0200
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 15:50, Pedro de Medeiros
<pedrovmm+lists gmail com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 15:07, Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 13:11 +0000, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
>>> Leonardo Fontenelle wrote on 29/10/08 00:50:
>>> >
>>> > http://library.gnome.org/devel/gdp-style-guide/stable/infodesign-2.html.en
>>> >
>>> > What's the difference between "introduction" and "getting started"?
>>> >...
>>>
>>> "Getting started" probably is helpful, "Introduction" probably isn't. ;-)
>>
>> If we're talking about documentation in general, I'd say
>> it depends on what you're writing. "Introduction" should
>> be used to introduce concepts and terminology. This is,
>> I suspect, most useful in developer documentation. But
>> it could be useful as a subsection title for more complex
>> applications. For instance, a section on charting for a
>> spreadsheet manual might be served well by an introduction.
>>
>> Now, if we're talking about the first section of a typical
>> application help manual, then we definitely want "Getting
>> Started". And not just the title. A "Getting Started"
>> section should be a real hands-on tutorial to how to use
>> the application.
>>
>> If you have a "Getting Started" section that reads like
>> the following, you've done something wrong.
>>
>> Beanstalk is an application for collecting and counting
>> magic beans. Beanstalk is free software under the GPL.
>> Beanstalk uses [boring list of libraries users really
>> do not care about]. Beanstalk can be used to [list of
>> things you can do, without telling you how to do any of
>> them]. In the future, [OK, stop. Documentation is not
>> the right place for your roadmap. Ever. Seriously.]
>
>
> Well, it seems that "introduction" should never be
> replaced by "getting started", but I think the opposite
> doesn't look so bad (i.e., replacing "getting started"
> by "introduction").
I take it back. I opened some manuals in yelp and I see
now that they are very different. Besides, a manual may
contain both sections (Totem for instance).
Pedro
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]